Tom Goodhead built Pogust Goodhead into one of Britain’s most prominent class-action law firms, taking on corporate giants like BHP and Volkswagen on behalf of hundreds of thousands of claimants and securing one of the largest litigation funding deals ever recorded.
Today, he finds himself on the outside of the firm he founded, publicly denying allegations that have upended its leadership, its finances, and its reputation.
From Founder to Ousted Chief Executive

Founded in 2018 by Tom Goodhead and Harris Pogust, the firm grew rapidly after securing a landmark 552.5 million dollar financing deal from US hedge fund Gramercy in 2023.
Goodhead was suddenly removed as chief executive last summer following a reported falling-out with the firm’s investors, triggering a broader restructuring of Pogust Goodhead’s senior leadership that saw restructuring consultant Huw Dolphin take on majority voting control and former COO Alicia Alinia step in as interim chief executive.
That leadership shake-up set the stage for an internal investigation into how the firm’s finances had been managed under Goodhead’s watch, an inquiry that would ultimately shape the public narrative around his departure.
The Allegations Against Goodhead
An internal investigation led by law firm DLA Piper reportedly found evidence of excessive and uncontrolled spending during Goodhead’s tenure. Insiders described frequent private jet and helicopter travel, business-class flights, luxury hotel stays, and staff yacht parties.
Combined travel and hospitality costs are said to have exceeded five million pounds between 2023 and 2024. The report also pointed to a 4.2 million pound director’s loan to Goodhead that was later written off, along with possible breaches of the firm’s funding agreements with Gramercy and an earlier backer, NorthWall Capital, raising further questions about oversight during his time at the top.
Goodhead’s Denial and Defense

Goodhead has firmly rejected the allegations, insisting that his expenses were business-related and broadly in line with practices at other City law firms of similar size. He has said the firm was financed through commercial loans rather than client funds, and that no litigation funds were ever used for personal spending.
He has described his removal as a boardroom coup rather than a legitimate governance decision, arguing that taking on powerful corporate defendants inevitably makes enemies, and has said he is still owed 2.7 million pounds for money he personally injected to help cover staff payroll shortly before his departure.
Conclusion
Pogust Goodhead’s new leadership maintains that the alleged conduct does not reflect the firm’s current values and that governance has since been strengthened. Overdue accounts have also revealed a deteriorating financial picture, with a 2022 pre-tax loss of close to 292 million pounds, total debts reportedly climbing to 97.5 million pounds by 2023, and auditors flagging material uncertainty over the firm’s future.
With Goodhead now gone and a new leadership team in place, the firm insists it remains focused on its flagship cases, including its ongoing litigation against BHP. Whether that reassures clients, staff, and investors after such a turbulent year remains to be seen.